Home | Airshows | The Hangar | Nostalgia | Links

X-35 - picture courtesy of LockheedBeauty or Beast…?

Now that the pantomime season is upon us, Tom McGhee looks at some of the ugly sisters of the air. All pictures by the author unless stated otherwise.

In what has been touted as the largest military aircraft contract ever, the winner of the Joint Strike Fighter contest was revealed to be the Lockheed Martin X-35 (left). When finally put into production, this aircraft is slated to replace thousands of F-16, F-18, AV-8, Harrier and Sea Harrier aircraft with numerous air arms throughout the world.

A fly-off evaluation against the Boeing X-32 (right) was completed during the course of 2001 and the two designs were found to be very comparable in most respects, and so it came as The unsuccessful X-32. Picture courtesy of Boeingsomething of a surprise when the Lockheed design was deemed to be the superior product. Sources close to the decision making process have revealed that the factor which tipped the balance against the Boeing product was its "sheer ugliness" when compared against the graceful Lockheed design. "We're fed up of our potential adversaries laughing at our hardware" claimed General Madeup when quizzed about the decision. "It's about time we had good-looking kit for our flyboys".

Halcyon days at BentwatersLooking back to past Pentagon aircraft procurement decisions shows that the General may well have a point, as some truly hideous designs have managed to make their way into squadron service. Probably the most obvious was the 1970s fly-off competition for a Close Air Support aircraft, a competition blessed with two unsightly designs in the Northrop YA-9 and Fairchild YA-10. The "distinctive" Fairchild design was chosen to be the most suitable, however, despite the USAF eventually coming up with an official name of Thunderbolt II, it is still universally known as the 'Warthog' (above left).

F-8 of the French Navy, sadly missedAnother ground attack aircraft was the LTV A-7 Corsair II, a pugnacious development of the US Navy's sleek F-8 Crusader (right). The A-7 was quickly given a nickname of SLUF (Short, Little, Ugly Fella) and proves that it is extremely easy to make a pig's ear out of a silk purse.

Gallic flair with the Mirage 2000CAesthetic appearance was never given much thought in the early flying days, as it was hard enough to get anything into the air, however as manufacturers managed to get more used to production techniques a modicum of style was gradually introduced, and the first truly beautiful fighter appeared in the shape of Supermarine's elegant Spitfire. This heralded the beginning of a period of British aviation design supremacy, epitomised by the stunning Hawker Hunter. However, in conjunction with the 1960s' decline in British aviation manufacturers, came Mirage F1a decline in style, typified by Blackburn's pug-ugly area-ruled Buccaneer. Even the more recent British designs like Tornado (with a totally out-of-scale vertical tail fin) and the Eurofighter are just workmanlike designs, and in recent years it has been the French who have taken up the mantle of aviation styling from the British. Their Rafale is infinitely more stylish than the Eurofighter, and their previous Mirage F1 (right) and Mirage 2000 (above left) designs have had a fair degree of elegance.

The unsuccessful YF-23But at last it appears that the Americans have finally started to get it right, their previous fly-off competition also resulted in Lockheed's sleek F-22 being selected over Northrop's strangely elongated F-23 (left) in the search for an F-15 replacement. So in the future maybe we can look forward to seeing less grotesque designs like F-117 and AH-64, and more generic sleek designs based on stealth requirements - but, if JSF is last of the mass-produced fighters, it might be a bit boring really!

Lockheed's F-35 - a common sight for years to come? Pic courtesy of Lockheed Is this really good looking?? Picture courtesy of Lockheed


Home | Airshows | The Hangar | Nostalgia | Links